John Glenn Believe in the Future Again 1984
The Speech: John Glenn; 'We're Talking Aout Trust, Basically'
See the commodity in its original context from
February 24, 1984
,
Section A , Page
13Buy Reprints
TimesMachine is an exclusive benefit for domicile delivery and digital subscribers.
About the Archive
This is a digitized version of an article from The Times's print archive, before the start of online publication in 1996. To preserve these manufactures as they originally appeared, The Times does not alter, edit or update them.
Occasionally the digitization process introduces transcription errors or other problems; nosotros are continuing to work to meliorate these archived versions.
Candidates seeking the Presidential nomination make dozens of speeches in their campaigns. The content often varies, depending on where a spoken language is given and who is in the audience, only a body of material appears, with only slight variation, in about every such speech.
These speeches are heard by thousands of people, but their texts are rarely published at length. This is the third in a series of texts of such "bones speeches," as collected by The New York Times.
We're talking nearly matters of great import coming upwards in the upcoming elections. We're talking about the hereafter of this land. We're talking about trust, basically, and trust in having the experience to deal with matters that are giving us problems but too trust in taking usa to the opportunities that are the future of this nation. And that trust has many facets to it, not only dealing with bug nosotros have correct now, such as: How nosotros bargain with war and peace, are nosotros jerking towards war? Are we hurtling towards peace over the last three years? Exercise we need to make a modify?
I put forward a five-point programme on how to bargain with this. I call back it'southward more detailed than anyone else, and I put it forwards basically because I come up out of a background that some of you haven't been through; two wars. I've known the devastation of war beginning-hand. We've had to write those next-of-kin messages. I don't want to run across anyone in history, if we can prevent information technology, always having to exercise that once again.
No one is going to exist any more pushy about keeping peace in this globe than I will. And in the economy for our state. Just mention the economic system and fiscal responsibility in this nation of ours. $200 billion a year deficits. Pay-Equally-You-Go Plan
What are we proposing? I'd ask for strong medicine in that area. I have said that we have to get back on a pay-as-yous-go system. That in itself is potent medicine with a 10 pct surcharge devoted solely to deficit reduction. Doing abroad with indexing or deferring indexing is another one. Those two things would proceeds us some $80 billion a twelvemonth by 1988.
Now that's stronger medicine past far than whatsoever other candidate, or the President, is willing to come out with. But I swear if we don't go control of this and c rol of interest rates, we're going to continue the pattern we've seen over the last couple of years, of our exports going down out of this country, that which employs i out of every half dozen of our industrial workers; one-third of our farm production going downwardly by a quaternary over the concluding two years, every bit interest rates accept stayed likewise high, and equally we, in effect, borrow money and try to transfer our responsibilities to our children and our grandchildren. That's no economic policy for the future, and I think we need the kind of strong medicine that I have proposed.
Are we going to build the future of this state? Practise nosotros take trus in how we're going to do improve? I take a lot of experience in the area of enquiry. I worked in that field. And the decisions we make to restore what Reagan did to our research budgets are only mandatory. He cut most thirty percent out of our research budget; basic research, not just infinite, but basic fundamental-breakthrough-Nobel laureate-elementary research. That which in the past has led this nation of ours into beingness the preeminent nation in the world. We've learned to do things first; we have built the new businesses and industries. Nosotros are the ones that put the jobs together; the employment together, and hired additional tens upon tens of millions of people. And now we come across that kind of new big cutback; being replaced by those other countries effectually this world who, would out-research us and out-brainwash u.s. in our ain time.
Educational activity¸ 13 percent of our 17-year-olds functionally illiterate. How about that? S.A.T. scores peaked out in '63, and they take been going downhill ever since. How about that? 10th in the World
On the international assessment scores, the United States of America's young people ranked tenth in teaching amoung the industrialized nations of the world. We ought to hang our heads in shame. 10th¸
Within 10 years nosotros should be dorsum upward in No. one in all those areas and I take programs put forward to do exactly that.
Then we desire to set objectives nether this and under trust and dealing with all of those things; and practise some other things, too, that deal with the concerns of all the people of this nation of ours; not just the special interests. I have no problem with special interests; everyone of united states of america is a member of a special involvement. But when candidates become to the special interests and overpromise and promise everything beyond what the budget tin can possibly stand, that'south irresponsible, and I will not get down that track. I think we have to become control of that upkeep and it'southward not going to be done past overpromising everything to everybody with a mailing list and a letterhead. I've spoken out against that. I don't believe it'south correct to go before big labor in Miami - I've got a skilful labor vote myself; good relationships with labor in Ohio - but go and promise 100, what may be as much as a $130 billion program? Friction match foreign governments subsidy for subsidy, dollar for dollar? $20 billion jobs program, and that's a conservative estimate? Could you promise these things and expect the men to come through?
And so I haven't gone out to promise that; it means so, secondly, under trust, besides all the programs I just mentioned we must keep the all-time interests of all the people of this nation balanced. All the people balanced, not just special ones who say I'll give $twenty million to your campaign or I'll put that in the lid here; we'll spend that on your campaign. That'southward like ownership lunch at $20 million; that'due south several times over what any of us have. To make all those promises to become that, I recall, is going too far. Middle-Stream Aim
What do we exercise? I would like to encounter united states, later on we have the trust up hither on these issues and afterwards we're saying we'll balance the needs of all the people of this country, to them we acknowledge that there are people who accept a tough time making it in our guild. Very tough fourth dimension. A democratic lodge is competitive; some have not had the aforementioned shake equally others in our club. We have to be caring enough to make certain that those to the lowest degree-advantaged among united states receive our compassion and our help. Beyond that I would say, as well, that we want to practice this with a centrist motion within the Democratic Party.
I don't believe in this banging of our pendulum. Our political swing is dorsum and forth, off to the right side, way over on superconservatism and going back to superliberalism on the other side. I remember if we could merely actuate those 75 or 80 percent of the middle-stream Democrats, those who just want to see us move on, they don't want to see things swaying back and forth one manner or the other.
If I can actuate those people to come out and vote I take no doubt how this whole matter will come outl Because they are people who believe equally I do that we must take a counterbalanced budget. And that nosotros in one case once again cannot present ourselves to the American people as leading a party of big spenders, weak on defense, and overpromising everything to everybody. If we come up before the people of this country with that kind of basis, then I say nosotros've dug ourselves into a hole that's going to be very difficult to go out of as we come upward to that election in November.
I want to come across this land exist a nation that sets goals for the future. I go back to John Kennedy days when at that place was excitement about bookish excellence, and steady goals and doing things, and I was part of that program and going upwardly into space, in fact, was part of the whole psyche of the country at that time; that we wanted to practice better. Now that I've had experience in science and studied some of these goals for the future; and had feel in the war machine on making defense decisions, and I can guarantee you that out of that experience also in wartime comes a dedication to peace. Goal of Being No. ane
I was in the business organisation world, international business organization too as domestic concern. I know what it's like to run across a payroll. And I've had Washington experience besides. So I want to prepare those goals for the long-term future for this country; goals that can move u.s. out alee not just to be in 2d place to other nations, but I want to ready goals so we go along this nation first in the future. And though I practise information technology like we do in football games or basketball games and wave the large styrofoam finger that says nosotros're No. 1, nosotros're No. 1, we're No. 1, we're No. one. No, it'due south not for that purpose.
Proud every bit I am of this land and having lived most of my adult life in service to this country, and proud as I am of this nation, the important affair virtually being No. one is it gives this nation control over its own destiny. We don't want to be dependent on Japanese for our research, on Germans for our transportation motorbus designs, or the French for runway designs or whatever. We're a nation that can be No. one in all these dissimilar fields if we just prepare our goals and we go for it. And that to me is of import becaus then that gives us and our children better control over our own future as a nation than we ever will have if nosotros see these cutbacks go along in research and in education; if we don't get control of our budget in this country; and if we don't have a strong defense for this nation of ours.
So I want to encounter us present that kind of a program to the people of this state. 1 that says we will take a solid defense for this nation. And we will make promises only equally they can exist kept. That's the way nosotros desire to make this country get for the future.
I need your help; I need your back up. I come from a minor town in Ohio where some values are still held dear. Values of honesty and decency, integrity and pride in state, and pride in our military; pride in this nation beingness No. 1, and I desire to see that go along, so I ask for your help. Together we can change the future of this state. And that'due south what it's all nigh.
rodriguezfead1962.blogspot.com
Source: https://www.nytimes.com/1984/02/24/us/the-speech-john-glenn-we-re-talking-aout-trust-basically.html
0 Response to "John Glenn Believe in the Future Again 1984"
Post a Comment